Barriers To Fostering Student Success In High-Poverty, High-Minority, High-Achieving Rural Schools

William Andrew Bergeron, Frances Kochan, Ellen Reames

Abstract


In this article we present the challenges facing high achieving, high poverty, and high minority rural schools in Alabama.  This is part one of a three part exploratory, qualitative, multi-case study, and it differs from most studies on the topic of overcoming the achievement gap in that the focus was on the perceptions of key stakeholders and not the programs, policies, curriculum, or leadership styles.  We identified three major recurring perceptions of the challenges facing the participant schools centered on three themes: student-centered issues, school-level challenges, and limited community support. One of the interesting aspects of this research is that a number of the issues identified as barriers to school success, particularly in rural school districts, were not identified in previous research. This article provides a window into the challenges these high-poverty, high-minority, and high-achieving rural schools in Alabama face in their quest to close the existing achievement gap to ensure their students have the tools necessary to be successful both in school and as productive adults after they graduate.


References


Arnold, M. L. (2000). Rural schools: Diverse needs call for flexible policies. Aurora: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441656.pdf

Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Loa Angeles: SAGE.

Carey, R. L. (2014, June). A cultural analysis of the achievement gap discourse: Challenging the language and labels used in the work of school reform. Urban Education, 49(4), 440–468. doi:10.1177/0042085913507459.

Carter, P. L. (2012). Stubborn roots: Race culture, and inequality in the U.S. and South African schools. New York, New York, United States: Oxford University Press.

Chapin, J. (2006). The achievement gap in social studies and science starts early: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. The Social Studies, 2, 231–238.

Cresswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

DeCuir-Gunby, J., Marshall, P., & McCulloch, A. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155.

Gibbs, R. (2000). The challenge ahead for rural schools. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 82–87. Retrieved November 5, 2013.

Harmon, H. L. (2001). Education issues in rural America. ARSI Conference on Understanding Achievement in Science and Mathematics in Rural School Settings (pp. 1–18). Lexington: ERIC.

Howley, C. (2001). Understanding the circumstances of rural schooling: The parameters of respectful research. Understanding Achievement in Science and Mathematics in Rural Schools (pp. 1–8). Lexington: ERIC.

Irvin, M. J., Byun, S., Meece, J. L., Farmer, T. W., & Hutchins, B. C. (2012). Educational barriers of rural youth: Relation of individual and contextual difference variables. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(1), 71–87. doi:10.1177/1069072711420105

Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2009). Why rural matters 2007: State and regional challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: The Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from The Rural School and Community Trust: http://www.ruraledu.org/articles.php?id=2312

Johnson, J., Showalter, D., Kein, R., & Lester, C. (2014). Why rural matters 2013–2014: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington DC: Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/2013-14-Why-Rural-Matters.pdf

Kuel, R. A. (2012). The rhetorical presidency and “accountability” in education reform: Comparing the presidential rhetoric of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. Southern Communication Journal, 77(4), 329–348. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2012.678926

Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291. doi:10.1080/15700761003731500.

Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Saunders, M. (2007). Research methods for business students. UK: Pearson Education.

Masumoto, M., & Brown-Welty, S. (2009). Case study of leadership practices and school-community interrelationships in high-performing, high-poverty, rural California high schools. Jurnal of Research in Rural Education, 24(1), 1–18.

Maxwell, G. M., Huggins, K. S., & Scheurich, J. J. (2010). How one historically underperfrming diverse rural high school achieved a successful turnaround. Planning and Changing, 3(4), 161–186. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952379.pdf

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 3rd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Phillips, K. J. (2010). What does “highly qualified” mean for student achievement? Evaluating the relationships between teacher quality indicators and at-risk students’ mathematics and reading achievement gains in first grade. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 464–493. Retrieved June 21, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/651192

Rosenberg, L., Christianson, M. D., Angus, M. H., & Rosenthal, E. (2014). A focused look at rural schools receiving school improvement grants. Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20144013/pdf/20144013.pdf

Stoll, L. (2009, April 8). Capacity building for school improvement or capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 115–127. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3

Theobald, P., & Wood, K. (2010). Learning to be rural: Identity lessons from history, schooling, and the U.S. corporate media. In K. A. Jackson (Ed.), Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world (pp. 17–33). University Park, PA: Pennsylvaina State University Press.

U.S. Department of Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education.

U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Rural education in America. Retrieved from National Center for Educational Statistics: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/definitions.asp

U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Rural education in America. Retrieved from Status of Rural Education in America: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_tla.asp

Whitehurst, G. (2002). Improving teacher quality. Journal of State Government, 75(3), 12–15. Retrieved June 21, 2014, from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.spot.lib.auburn.edu/ehost/ resultsadvanced?sid=b525ac56-b20d-4c66-b075-94e0bb29f8ed%40sessionmgr 4003&vid=21&hid=4210&bquery=(Improving+Teacher+Quality)+AND+(AU+(Whitehurst))&bdata=JmRiPWFwaCZkYj1sMGgmZGI9YXdoJmRiPWFobCZkYj12dGgmZ

Wilcox, K. C., Angelis, J. I., Baker, L., & Lawson, H. A. (2014). The value of people, place and possibilities: A multiple case study of rural high school completion. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(9), 1–18. Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/29-9.pdf

Williams, A. (2011). A call for change: Narrowing the achievement gap between white and minority students. The Clearing House, 84(2), 65–71. doi:10.1080/00098655.2010.511308

Williams, D. T., & King, J. R.-E. (2002). Rural school leadership in the deep south: The double-edged legacy of school desegregation. Washington DC: The Rural Schools and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/Double-Edged_Leg

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.