Connecting to Students Through Place

Ann K Schulte

Abstract


Two teaching residency programs in northern California have provided some insight into graduates’ preparation for, and inclination to pursue, teaching in a rural school. Both programs include early coursework that addresses the needs and strengths of rural communities and requires candidates to conduct an in-depth study of their placement community. This article specifically describes features of the community study assignment that aims to have preservice teachers examine their understandings about rural places, to create a connection to the place where students live, and to promote place-based pedagogy. Student feedback suggests the assignment is a promising practice for teacher preparation. A rural-focused curriculum and a strong understanding of the community creates conditions that support both the recruitment and retention of teachers in rural schools.

 


Keywords


rural; recruitment; retention; residency; collaboration

References


Azano, A. P. (2014). Rural the other neglected R: Making space for place in rural libraries. Knowledge Quest, 43(1), 60-65.

Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2015). Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing pre-service teachers for success in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(9), 1-12.

Budge, K. (2006). Rural leaders, rural places: Problem, privilege and possibility. Journal of Research in Rural Education. 21(13), 1-10.

Callingham, M. (2013). Democratic youth participation: A strength-based approach to youth investigating educational engagement. Youth Studies Australia. 32 (4), 48-56.

Corbett, M. (2016). Rural futures: Development, aspirations, mobilities, place and education. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(2), 270-282.

Edmondson, J. & Butler, T. (2010). Teaching school in rural America: Toward an educated hope. In K. Schafft & A. Youngblood Jackson (Eds.) Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world (150-172). University Park, PA: Penn State Press.

Friend, M. (2007). Co-Teach! A handbook for creating and sustaining effective classroom partnerships in inclusive schools. Greensboro, NC: Marilyn Friend.

Fong, A. B., Makkonen, R., & Jaquet, K. (2016). Projections of California teacher retirements: A county and regional perspective (REL 2017–181). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/pdf/REL_2017181.pdf

Gardner, M. & Troope, D. (2011) A social justice perspective on strengths-based approaches: Exploring educators’ perspectives and practices. Canadian Journal of Education. 34 (3), 86-102.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2008). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Environmental Education Research. 14 (3), 308-324.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619-654.

Hammer, P.C., Hughes, G., McClure, C., Reeves, C., & Salgado, D. (2005). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of the research literature, national survey of rural superintendents and case studies of programs in Virginia. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489143.pdf

Lytle, S. L. & Cochran-Smith, M. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.

Orr, D. (2013). Place and pedagogy. The North American Montessori Teachers Association Journal, 38(1), 183-188. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078034.pdf

Reininger, M. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ963419

Roughton, A. (2017). The effect of placed-based curriculum on student sense of place. Unpublished manuscript, CSU, Chico, California.

Schafft, K. (2016). Rural education as rural development: Understanding the rural school-community well-being linkage in a 21st century policy context. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(2), 137-154.

Schulte, A. K. & Justeson, R. (in press). Increasing teacher efficacy through rural partnerships. In T. E. Hodges & A. Baum (Eds.). Handbook of research on field-based teacher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Schulte, A. K. & Klipfel, L. (2016). External influences on an internal process: Supporting preservice teacher research. The Educational Forum, 80, 457-465.

Sharplin, E. (2002). Rural retreat or outback hell: Expectations of rural and remote teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 12. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier12/sharplin.html

Theobald, P. & Wood, K. (2010). Learning to be rural: Identity lessons from history, schooling, and the U.S. Corporate Media. In K. Schafft & A. Y. Jackson (Eds.), Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world (pp. 17-33). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Trinidad, S., r, E., Ledger, S., & Broadley, T. (2014). Connecting for innovation: Four universities collaboratively preparing pre-service teachers to teach in rural and remote Western Australia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(2), 1-13.

Walker-Gibbs, B., Ludecke, M. & Kline, J. (2015) International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 10(1), 81–89 http://dx.doi.org/

1080/22040552.2015.1086292


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu