A Brief Summary of Teacher Recruitment and Retention in the Smallest Illinois Rural Schools

John David Ulferts


Teacher recruitment and retention factors were identified in the smallest public school districts in Illinois. Findings were compared to a previous study of Montana rural teacher recruitment and retention conducted by Davis (2002).  A quantitative survey instrument was administered to teachers employed in the 24 smallest Illinois school districts.  The survey consisted of Likert-type items measuring recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction factors and was based on the Boylan (1993) four spheres of influence for teacher recruitment and retention:  1) within classroom activities, 2) whole school level activities, 3) community level activities, and 4) family/personal factors.  Results were similar to the Davis study with the family/personal and whole school level spheres most important to teacher recruitment and the community and within classroom spheres most important to teacher retention.  Teachers were also asked to identify the recruitment and retention strategies they perceived as being most important for rural school districts and to respond to three professional satisfaction questions.  The study concluded with recommendations for both educational practitioners and researchers.


recruitment; retention; teacher satisfaction; smallest rural school districts


Ahearn, C., Harmon, H., Sanders, J. (2005). How to recruit and retain teachers and other school leaders in hard-to-staff rural and small school districts. Greensboro, NC: Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. http://www.serve.org/FileLibraryDetails.aspx?id=76.

Bogler, R. (2002). Two profiles of schoolteachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 665–673. Retrieved from http://www.stat.ufl.edu/STA%204702/Spring%2007/DA%20Bogler%20schoolteacher%20job%20satisfaction%202002.pdf

Boylan, C., Sinclair, R., Smith, A, Squires, D., Edwards, J., Jacob, A., O’Malley, D., & Nolan, B. (1993). Retaining teachers in rural schools: Satisfaction, commitment, and lifestyle. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365499.pdf

Davis, M. (2002). An investigation of factors related to teacher retention in small rural school districts in Montana (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/8187/31762103589360.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Dee, T. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.

Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554.

Dessoff, A. (2010, June). Persuading teachers to go rural: District administrators craft incentives to attract and retain teachers. District Administration, 46(6), 58-60. Retrieved from: http://www.districtadministration.com/article/persuading-teachers-go-rural

Eberhard, J., Reinhardt-Mondragon, P., & Stottlemyer, B. (2000). Strategies for new teacher retention: Creating a climate of authentic professional development for teachers with three or less years of experience. Corpus Christi: TX: A&M University, South Texas Research and Development Center. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?q=Strategies+for+New+Teacher+Retention%3a+Creating+a+Climate+of+Authentic+Professional+Development+for+Teachers+with+Three+or+Less+Years+of+Experience&id=ED450116

Huling, L. (1998, November). Texas board for educator certification panel on novice teacher induction support system: Final report. Austin, TX: Texas State Board for Educator Certification.

Huysman, J. (2008). Rural teacher satisfaction: An analysis of beliefs and attitudes of rural teachers' job satisfaction. Rural Educator, 29(2), 31-38. Retrieved from http://www.ruraleducator.net/archive/29-2/29-2_Huysman.pdf

Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED526355.pdf

Jimerson, L. (March 2003). The competitive disadvantage: Teacher compensation in rural America. Washington, DC: The Rural School and Community Trust Policy Brief. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474248.pdf

Kalmar, B., & Ruby, H. (1930). Hello, I must be going. (Recorded by Groucho Marx). On An Evening with Groucho [LP record]. Santa Monica, California: A & M Records. (1972).

Maakel, M., & Plucker, J. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43 (6), 304-316.

Maranto, R., & Shuls, J. V. (2012). How do we get them on the farm? Efforts to improve rural teacher recruitment and retention in Arkansas. Rural Educator, 34(1). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.ezproxy.wiu.edu/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1000101

McClure, C., Reeves, C., & AEL, I. V. (2004). Rural teacher recruitment and retention review of the research and practice literature. AEL, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.ezproxy.wiu.edu/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?acno=ED484967

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Number of public elementary and secondary education agencies, by type of agency and state or jurisdiction: 2010-11 and 2011-12. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_214.30.asp

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2007). The high cost of teacher turnover. Retrieved from http://www.nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NCTAF-Cost-of -Teacher-Turnover-2007-policy-brief.pdf

Natkin, J., & Mooney, K. (2003). Preliminary report on nominal and focus group sessions. The SERVE Center at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Rice, J., & Urban Institute, N. (2010). The impact of teacher experience: Examining the evidence and policy implications. Brief No. 11. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/publications/upload/1001455-impact-teacher-experience.pdf

Riggs, L. (2013, October l8). Why do teachers quit and why do they stay? The Atlantic Monthly 312(3). Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/10/why-do-teachers-quit/280699/

Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. (2004). Unfilled promise: Ensuring high quality teachers for our nation’s students. No Child Left Behind: A status report from southeastern schools. Chapel Hill, NC: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved from www.teachingquality.org

Strange, M., Johnson, J., Showalter, D., & Klein, R. (2012). Why Rural Matters 2011-12: The Condition of Rural Education in the 50 States. A Report of the Rural School and Community Trust Policy Program. Washington, DC: Rural School And Community Trust. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED528634.pdf

Williams, M. (1960). Stay (Recorded by Jackson Browne). On Running on empty (CD). Los Angeles, CA: Elektra/Rhino. (Reissued 2005).

U.S. Census Bureau. (1995). 1990 Urban and rural definitions. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/docs/ua/urdef.txt.

U.S. Department of Education. (2012). New data from U.S. Department of Education highlights educational inequities around teacher experience, discipline and high school rigor. Retrieved from: http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/new-data-us-department-education-highlights-educational-inequities-around-teachers

Zhang, Y. (2008). Some perspectives from rural school districts on the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503795.pdf

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu