Teachers’ Beliefs about Poverty and the Impact on Learning Disabilities Identification in a Poor, Rural School District

Renee Chandler

Abstract


This qualitative case study examined a rural school district where many of the students live in poverty. The purpose of the study was to develop a deeper understanding of the learning disability (LD) identification process as implemented in a high-poverty rural setting. Analysis of the data revealed the prevalence of some stereotypical beliefs regarding poverty. In addition, the findings revealed use of a traditional, Intelligence Quotient (IQ)-Achievement discrepancy model rather than Response to Intervention (RTI). Furthermore, participants conveyed that their deliberations do not typically include the legally required consideration that other factors (such as poverty) may be the primary reason that the student is struggling. Recommendations include providing educational activities to challenge stereotypical beliefs about people living in poverty, considering socioeconomic reform in discussions about school improvement, supporting teachers in their efforts to meet the needs of all students in their classrooms, and implementing assessment methods designed to help students receive the assistance needed as early as possible.

Keywords


rural education; rural schools; high-poverty schools; learning disability

References


Bateman, B. (2005). The play’s the thing. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28(2), 93-95.

Bocian, K. M., Beebe, M. E., McMillan D., & Gresham, F. M. (1999). Competing paradigms in learning disabilities classification by schools and the variations in the meaning of discrepant achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(1), 1-14.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Books, S. (1997). The other poor: Rural poverty and education. Educational Foundations, 11(1), 73-85.

Diffily, D., & Perkins, H. (2002). Preparing to teach in urban schools: Advice from urban teachers. Teacher Education and Practice: The Journal of the Texas Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 15(1-2), 57-73.

Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(4), 364-372.

Fletcher, T., & Navarrete, L. (2003). Learning disabilities or difference: A critical look at the issues associated with the misidentification and placement of Hispanic students in special education programs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 22(4), 37-46.

Fuchs, D. M., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities: Resource & Practice, 18(3), 157-171.

Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Implementing responsiveness to intervention to identify learning disabilities. Perspectives, 32(1), 39–43.

Gibboney, R.A. (2008, September). Why an undemocratic capitalism has brought public education to its knees: A manifesto. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(1), 21-31.

Harris, J. D., Gray, B. A., Davis, J. E., Zaremba, E. T., & Argulewicz, E. N. (1997). The exclusionary clause and the disadvantaged: Do we try to comply with the law? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(9), 581-583.

Jensen, L. (2006). At the razor’s edge: Building hope for America’s rural poor [Electronic Version]. Rural Sociology’s Quarterly Publication, 1(1).

Lerner, J.W., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Characteristics, teaching strategies, and new directions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor [Electronic version]. American Psychologist, 57(2), 100-110.

Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

O’Hare, W.P. (2009). The forgotten fifth: Child poverty in rural America. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

Olmeda, I.M. (1997). Challenging old assumptions: Preparing teachers for inner city schools. Teacher and Teacher Education, 13(3), 245-58.

Rothstein, R. (2008, April). Whose problem is poverty? Educational Leadership, 65(7), 8-13.

Shepard, L. (1983). The role of measurement in educational policy: Lessons from the identification of learning disabilities. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(7), 4-8.

Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7-26.

Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2007). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

U.S. Department of Education (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 § 1400 et seq.

Weintraub, F. (2005). The evolution of LD policy and future challenges. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28(2), 97-99.

Zeichner, K. M. (2003). The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 490-519.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu