A Comparison of Collaborative Practice and Teacher Leadership Between Low-Performing and High-Performing Rural Kentucky High Schools

Meagan R. Musselman, Meg A. Crittenden, Robert P. Lyons

Abstract


This article reports the findings of the 2011 results of ‘very rural’ Kentucky high schools on the Teaching, Empowering, Leading and Learning (TELL) Survey to determine whether differences existed between high and low performing rural schools across specific survey items. Schools with ACT scores one standard deviation (or more) above their predicted value were compared to rural high schools where students’ ACT scores were one standard deviation (or more) below their predicted value. Beale Codes of seven through nine from the United States Department of Agriculture were used to identify very rural Kentucky high schools. Very rural high schools identified as high-performing demonstrated significantly different results on survey items related to a culture of collaboration and teacher leadership than rural high schools identified as low performing. The survey suggested that in high-performing schools, the principal and teachers supported each other in their development as instructional leaders, and established communication and collaboration skills with families and community stakeholders.

Keywords


teacher leadership; collaborative practice; TELL survey; high-performing high schools, rural high schools

References


Adsit, T. (2011). Small schools, education, and the importance of community: Pathways to improvement and a sustainable future. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Bell, A., & Sigsworth, A. (1987). The small rural primary school: A matter of quality, London, The Falmer Press.

Bellon, T., & Beaudry, J. (1992, April). Teachers' perceptions of their leadership roles in site based decision making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Berg, J., Bosch, C. & Souvanna, P. (2013). Critical conditions. Journal of Staff Development, 34(6), 26-29.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.

Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1992). How teachers make restructuring happen. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 53-56.

Brody, J.A. (1977). A good teacher is harder to define than find. American School Board Journal, 164(7), 25-28.

Bryan, J., & Henry, L. (2012). A model for building school-family-community partnerships: Principles and process. Journal of Counseling & development, 90(4), 408-420.

Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Danielson, C. (2007, September). The many faces of leadership, Teachers as leaders, 65(1), 14-19.

Dewey, J. (1959). The public and its problems. New York: Teachers College Press.

Donaldson Jr., G. A. (2007, September). What do teachers bring to leadership? Teachers as Leaders, 65(1), 26-29.

Drago-Severson, E. (2004). Helping teachers learn: Principal leadership for adult growth and development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G. & Nagengast, B. (2014). Quality of parental homework involvement: Predictions and reciprocal relations with academic functioning in the reading domain, Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 144-161.

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gabriel, J. (2005). How to thrive as a teacher leader. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Galindo, C., & Sheldon, S.B. (2012). School and home connections and children’s kindergarten achievement gains: The mediating role of family involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 90-103.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Gorski, P. (2013). Building a pedagogy of engagement for students in poverty. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 48-52.

Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527-549.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.

Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003, May). Sustaining Leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.

Henderson, A., & Mapp, K. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Herzog, M. J., & Pittman, R. B. (1995). Home, family, and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(2), 113-118.

Hirsch, E., Sioberg, A., Daugherty, P., Maddock, A., & Church, K. (2012). TELL Kentucky: Creating supportive conditions for enhancing teacher effectiveness. Retrieved from www.tellkentucky.org

Howey, K.R. (1988). Why teacher leadership? Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1). 28-31.

Kentucky Department of Education (2014). 2013-2014 Kentucky Schools Directory. http://education.ky.gov/comm/Pages/2013-2014-Kentucky-Schools-Directory.aspx

Kythreotis, A., & Pashiartis, P. (1998). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Nicosia: University of Cyprus.

Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Leithwood, K.A., & Riehl, C. (2003, March). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Washington, DC: AERA Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.

Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. St. Paul, MO: Learning From Research Project: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI); Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto (OISEUT); and New York: The Wallace Foundation.

Mapp, K. (2004). Family engagement. In F. P. Schargel & J. Smink (Eds), Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention (pp. 99-113). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Marks, H.M., & & Printy, S.M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.

Marzano, R., Waters, T. & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association of Curriculum and Development; and Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

Mattessich, P., Monsey, B. (1993). Collaboration: What makes it work? St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

Mendel, C. M., Watson, R. L., & MacGregor, C. J. (2002). A study of leadership behaviors of elementary principals compared with school climate. Paper presented at the Southern Regional Council for Educational Administration, Kansas City, MO.

Miedel, W., & Reynolds, A. (1999). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter? Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 379-402.

Miller, D.C. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Mitchell, R.D. (1998). World class teachers: When top teachers earn National Board Certification, schools-and students-reap the benefits. The American School Board Journal, 185(9), 27-29.

Mullen, C.A., & Lick, D.W. (Eds.). (1999). New directions in mentoring: Creating a culture of synergy. New York: Falmer Press.

Patall, E. A., Cooper, H. & Robinson, J. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101.

Reason, C., & Reason, L. (2007, September). Asking the right questions. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 36-47.

Schargel , F.P., & Smink, J. (2004). Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

SEDL (1992). Leadership characteristics that facilitate change; Characteristics of leaders of change. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. http://www.sedl.org/change/leadership/character.html

Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N. Lucas, T. Smith, B., Dutton, J., Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

Sheridan, S. M., Bovaird, J. A., Glover, T. A., Garbacz, S. A., Witte, A., & Kwon, K. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of the parent-teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 23-46.

Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stronge, J.H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association of Curriculum and Development.

Stronge, J.H., Richard, H. B., & Catano, N. (2008). Qualities of effective principals. Alexandria, VA: Association of Curriculum and Development.

Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium (2012, February). Model teacher leader standards. Retrieved from http://tlstandards.pbworks.com/f/13852_TeacherLeaderStnds_HR.pdf

The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. (2005). What does the research tell us about teacher leadership? Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.centerforcsri.org/files/Center_RB_sept05.pdf

United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2013). Rural-Urban continuum codes. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx#.UxTcjfldWSo

Waugh, R.F. & Punch, K.F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 237-254.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu