How Size and Setting Impact Education in Rural Schools

Emily C. Bouck


School variables, such as school size and school location, matter. School size and location impact many areas of education, including the characteristics of the school, curriculum, and post-school outcomes. Research reveals that students in rural schools face many personal and education hardships – from living in poverty to having less opportunity and sophistication in technology. Rural schools also have fewer course offerings. While rural schools are a unique, urban and rural schools may be more similar than expected, particularly as compared to more affluent suburban districts. Rural and urban schools have larger rates of poverty and more dire financial situations, which do impact the educational offerings, experiences, and outcomes of their students.


Alexander, N.A. (2002). Race, Poverty, and the student curriculum: Implications for standards policy. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 675-693.

Alexander, N.A. (2000). The missing link: an economic analysis on the impact of curriculum standards on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 19, 351-361.

Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). The relationship of school and community characteristics to high school drop-out Rates. The Clearing House, 71(3), p. 184-88

Anyon, J. (2003). Inner cities, affluent suburbs, and the unequal educational opportunity. In J.A. Banks & C.A McGee Banks (Eds.) Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed.) (pp. 85-102). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cobb, R. A., McIntire, W. G., & Pratt, P. A. (1989). Vocational and educational aspirations of high school students: A problem for rural America. Research in Rural Education, 6(2), 11-23.

Cohen, D.K. & Barnes, C.A. (1999). Research and purposes of Education. In E.C. Lagemann & L.S. Shulman (Eds.) Issues in education research: Problems and Possibilities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Downey, R.G. (1980, November). Higher education and rural youth. Paper presented at annual Kansas State University Rural and Small School Conference, Mahattan, KS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED2014590).

Ediger, M. (1999). The pupil in the rural schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 280-285.

Edington, E.D. & Koehler, L. (1987). Rural student achievement: Elements for consideration. ERIC Digest, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289658).

Farley, R.P. (1999). A tale of two schools. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 39-42.

Fowler, Jr., W. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1991). School size, characteristics, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(2), 189-202.

Haas, T. (1992). What can I become: Educational aspirations of students in rural America. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED2014590). Retrieved March 23, 2004 from

Haberman, M. (1999). The anti-learning curriculum of urban schools, part 2: The solution. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 35, 71-74.

Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economies of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.

Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-65.

Hatfield, L. L. (2002, November). Up the back holler, down the dusty road, cross the windy prairie”: Issues, perspectives, and strategies for research in the crisis of improving mathematical education of rural youth. Paper presented at the ACCLAIM Research Symposium: McArthur, Ohio. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from .

Hudson, L. & Shafter, L. (2002). Vocational education offerings in rural high schools. NCES Fall 2002 Quarterly. Retrieved January 16, 2003, from

King, R. A. & MacPhail-Wilcox, B. (1994). Unraveling the Production Equation: The Continuing Quest for Resources that Make a Difference. Journal of Education Finance, 20, 47-65.

Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.

Monk, D.H. & Carlsen, W.S. (1992, April). Rural/Nonrural differences among secondary science teachers: Evidence from the longitudinal study of American youth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED350133).

Monk, D.H. & Haller, E.J. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 3-21.

National Education Association. (2003). Rural Education. National Education Association. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from

Neito, S. (2003). School Reform and Student Learning: A Multicultural Perspective. In J.A. Banks & C.A McGee Banks (Eds.) Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Office of Special Education (1995). Number and characteristics of students with disabilities in rural districts. In To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities (chap. 7). Retrieved January 16, 2003, from

Owens, E.W. & Waxman, H.C. (1996). Differences among urban, suburban, and rural schools on technology access and use in eighth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 83-92.

Raymond, A. (1995). A rural school mobilized the people and miracles happened. Teaching PreK-8, 26, 52-57.

Raywid, A. (1997/98). Small schools: A reform that works. Educational Leadership, 55, 34-39.

Sparks, D. (2000). High-powered professional development for high poverty schools. Principal Leadership, 1, 26-29.

Spilman, C.E. (1995/1996). Transforming an urban school. Educational Leadership, 53, 34-39.

Stringfield, S. & Teddlie, C. (1991). School, classroom, and student level indicators of rural school effectiveness. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 7, 15-28.

Wenglinsky, H. (1997). How money matters: The effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(3), 221-237.

Wilson, S.M. (1985). Differences in elementary math instruction and achievement among districts of varying size in the state of Washington. Research in Rural Education, 3, 51-55.

Young, D. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 386-418.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publication of the National Rural Education Association -

Report problems or questions about to the website to