Overcoming Obstacles to Preparing for College: Perspectives from a Rural Upward Bound Program

Andre Grimard, John Maddaus

Abstract


This research study examines the major obstacles low-income rural youth face in preparing to attend college and how to overcome these obstacles through the participation in an Upward Bound program. The data for this study are from a single-site of the regular (“Classic”) Upward Bound program at a public university in a rural New England state and include surveys and interviews with students, guidance counselors, and parents and/or guardians of Upward Bound students. The results of this study indicated that there are two primary barriers that low-income rural students face in preparing for college: financial and social. Students and parents considered applying to the program not only for academic reasons but also for financial and social reasons. Once enrolled in the program, rural students began to benefit academically, financially, and socially. The retention rate at this public  university is significantly higher than the national retention rate reported by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Several recommendations for practice for rural Upward Bound programs and high schools serving rural Upward Bound-eligible students are included.

References


Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In Wozniak, R.H. & Fischer, K.W., (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp.3-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Council for Opportunity in Education (2004, April 1). What is TRIO? Retrieved April 1, 2004 at http://www.coenet.us/abouttrio.html

Gibbs, R. M. (1998). College completion and return migration among rural youth. In Gibbs, R.M., Swaim, P. & Teixeira, R. (Eds.), Rural Education and Training in the New Economy: The myths of the Rural skills gap. (pp. 61-80). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Herzog, M J. R. & Pittman, R. (1999). The Nature of rural schools: Trends, perception and values. In Chalker, D. M. (Ed.), Leadership for Rural Schools: Lessons for all educators. (pp. 11-23). Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company.

Ingels, S. J., Curtin, T.R., Kaufmann, P., Alt, M. N., and Chen, X. (2002). Coming of Age In the 1990’s: The Eighth-Grade Class of 1988 12 Years Later. (NCES 2002-321). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved March 31, 2004 at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/Pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002321.

London, H. (1992). Transformations: Cultural challenges faced by first-generation students. In Zwerling, L., and London H., (Eds.) First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues. (New Directions for Community Colleges) 80, Winter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McIntire, W. (1994a, Dec. 12). The immediate vocational and academic choices of Maine’s 1994 high school graduates. Orono, ME: University of Maine College of Education

McIntire, W. (1994b, Dec. 12). Maine’s 1994 high school graduates and Upward Bound participants: A six-month follow-up. Orono, ME: University of Maine College of Education.

Moore, M.T., Fasciano, N.J., Jacobson, J.E., Myers, D. & Waldman, Z. (1997, May). The National Evaluation of Upward Bound. A 1990’s view of Upward Bound: Programs offered, students served and operational issues. Background reports: Grantee survey report, Target school report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414850).

Myers, D. E. & Schirm, A. L. (1999, April). The impacts of Upward Bound: Final report for Phase I of the national evaluation. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Paasch, K. M. and Swaim, P. L. (1998) Rural high school completion. In Gibbs, R. M., Swaim, P. L., & Teixeira, R. (Eds.), Rural education and training in the new economy: The myths of the rural skills gap. (pp. 41-59). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Schmuck, R. A. & Schmuck P.A. (1992). Small districts big problems: Making school everybody’s house. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Terenzini, P., et. al. (1996), First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive Development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1).

U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001, June 1). Table 14: enrollment Status of Dependent Primary Family Members 18 to 24 Years Old, by Family Income, Level of Enrollment Type of School, Attendance Status, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin: October 2000. Retrieved March 31, 2004 at http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/school/ppl-148/tab14.txt

U.S. Department of Education (n.d.). Trio/Upward Bound Program. Retrieved March 31, 2004 at http://www.ed.gov/programs/trioupbound/index.html

Willet, I. (1989). Are two-year college students firstgeneration students? Community College Review, 17(2).

York-Anderson, D. and Bowman, S. (1991). Assessing the college knowledge of first-generation and Secondgeneration college students. Journal of College Student Development, 32.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu