I Know This To Be True…: Perceptions of Teachers in One Rural Elementary School Regarding Writing Scores

Kathy Brashears


This study is set in an elementary school located in a rural, Appalachian area and considers the reasons that teachers attribute to student success on state writing assessments as well as to what reasons they attribute their students’ lack of success in moving beyond an average ranking. In considering these reasons, patterns emerge in the data that prove intriguing. For example, one pattern indicates that teachers link the lack of student success to aspects beyond their control. These aspects include student home life, socioeconomic levels, and parental attitudes toward school. The second emerging pattern shows that teachers couple their own teaching practices with student achievement. Such indications have great implications for future studies in that the perceptions of teachers may be key in utilizing the results of standardized assessments.


Alan, Richard (2001). Rural schools trying out portfolio assessment. Education Week, 21 (9), p. 5.

Culham, Ruth (2003). 6 + 1 traits of writing. New York, New York: Scholastic Inc.

Foster, Jack D. (1999). Redesigning Public Education: The Kentucky Experience. Lexington, Kentucky: Publications Division Diversified Services, Inc.

Green, K.E. (1992). Differing opinions on testing between preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 86, pp. 37-42.

Heath, Shirley Brice (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hillocks, George (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York, New York: Teachers College Press.

Kentucky Department of Education (2005, November 11). About schools and districts. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.education.ky.gov.KDE

Kentucky Department of Education (2005, June 5). Student performance standards. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.education.ky.gov.KDE

Kentucky Department of Education (2005, March 2). Writing Development Teacher’s Handbook. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.education.ky.gov.KDE

Kohn, Alfie (1999). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and “tougher standards.” New York, New York: Houston Mifflin Company.

LeCompte, Margaret and Schensul, Jean (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data: 5 Ethnographer’s toolkit. Walnut Creek, California: Altamira Press.

McDaniels, Garry L. (1998). How about student writing: Is it better or worse? Curriculum Administrator, 33 (5). Retrieved May 23, 2003, from EBSCO database.

Miles, Matthew B. and Huberman, A. Michael (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence, (n.d.). Kentucky school updates: A parent/citizen guide 2004-2006. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.prichardcommitte.org

Smith, Frank (1998). The book of learning and forgetting. New York, New York: Teachers College Press.

Stuhlmann, Janice; Daniel, Cathy; Dellinger, Amy; Denny, Kenton; Powers, Taylor (1999). A generalizability study of the effects of training on teachers’ abilities to rate children’s writing using a rubric. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, pp. 107-127.

United States Census Bureau, 2000. Rates on personal income, education, and poverty, 2000. Retrieved on May 8, 2005, from http://quickfacts.census.gov

United States Department of Treasury (1999). Central Appalachian Peoples Federal Credit Union: Individual Development Accounts-Participant Profiles, 1999. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.ots.treas.gov/docs/4/48046.pdf

Wheelan and Kesselring (2005). Link between faculty group development and elementary student performance on standardized tests. Journal of Educational Research, 98, p. 323-328.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu