Challenges and Changes Faced by Rural Superintendents

Marcia L. Lamkin

Abstract


This research study was designed to build grounded theory about the challenges faced by rural superintendents. Participating rural superintendents identified five areas that presented a challenge but that also applied to superintendents in other settings: school law, finance, personnel, government mandates, and district or board policies. Further, these superintendents identified challenges related specifically to the rural setting and to their lack of acculturation to the demands of rural school leadership. Focus group research conducted among rural superintendents in New York, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee indicated that the challenges of the rural superintendency were distinct enough to warrant some specialized preparation for such service.

References


Barker, B. O. (1985). A description of rural school districts in the United States. The Rural Educator, 3(6), i.

Beckner, W. (1983). The case for smaller schools. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan Foundation.

Bryant, M. T., & Grady, M. L. (1989). Superintendent turnover in rural school districts. Educational Considerations, 16(1), 34-36.

Chance, E. W. (1999). The rural superintendent: Succeeding or failing as a superintendent in rural schools. In D. M. Chalker (Ed.), Leadership for rural schools: Lessons for all. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co.

Chance, E. W., & Capps, J. L. (1992). Superintendent stability in schools. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 9(2), 23-32.

Coleman, P., & LaRocque, L. (1988). Reaching out: Instructional leadership in school districts. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(4), 60-89.

Cooper, B., Fuscarelli, L., & Carella, V. (2000). Career crisis in the school superintendency? Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crowson, R. L., & Glass, T. E. (1991, April). The changing role of the local school district superintendent in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Cuban. L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practice at the district level. Harvard Educational Review, 54(2), 129-151.

DeYoung, A. J. (1994, January). Researching rural American schools: Continuing cultural themes and cultural conflicts in the countryside. Lexington: Appalachian Center at Kentucky University.

Glass, T. E. (1991). Research perspectives on the superintendency 1990. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Glass, T., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C. (2000). The 2000 study of the American school superintendency: A look at the superintendent of education in the new millennium. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Grady, M. L., & Bryant, M. T. (1991a). School board turmoil and superintendent turnover: What pushes them to the brink? School Administrator, 48(2), 19-26.

Grady, M. L., & Bryant, M. T. (1991b). A study of frequent superintendent turnover in a rural school district: the constituents’ perspective. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 3(4), 10-13.

Greenfield, W. (1995, February). Toward a theory of school administration: the centrality of leadership. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 31, 61-85.

Haas, T. (1991). Why reform doesn’t apply. In A. J. DeYoung (Ed.), Rural educational issues and practice. New York: Garland.

Herzog, M. J. R., & Pittman, R. (1999). The nature of rural schools: trends, perceptions and values. In D. M. Chalker (Ed.), Leadership for rural schools: Lessons for all. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co.

Holmes, N. C. (1991). Consolidate, cooperate, or collaborate: Dilemmas of rural schools. In M. Fitzmaurice, Spotlight on rural schools in New Jersey: A directory of effective programs, practices, and resources for rural educators. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.

Jacobson, S. L. (1988a). The rural superintendency: Reconsidering the administrative farm system. Research in Rural Education, 2(5), 37-42.

Jacobson, S. L. (1988b). Effective superintendents of small, rural districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 2(2), 17-21.

Kadamus, J. A. (2002, April 10). Creating a framework for the preparation of school leaders [Memo to the members of the Board of Regents of New York State].

Keeney, L., & Devaney, K. (Eds.). (1982). Four workparties focus on rural education. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development: Teachers’ Center Exchange.

Krueger, R., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Leach, E. L. (1991, October). Rural school administrators for a new age. Paper presented at the 83rd annual conference of the National Rural Education Association, Jackson, MS.

Leithwood, K., & Montgomery, D. J. (1986). The principal profile. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Manasse, A. L. (1985). Vision and leadership: paying attention to inattention. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(1), 150-173.

Musella, D., & Leithwood, K. (1988). The influence of chief education officers on school effectiveness. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(4), 90-112.

New York State Council of School Superintendents and the Membership Committee (NYSCOSS). (2001, March). Snapshot 2000: a study of school superintendents in New York State. Albany.

Peterson, K. D. (1984). Mechanisms of administrative control over managers in educational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 573-597.

Peterson, K. D., Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1987). Superintendent perceptions of the control and coordination of the technical core in effective school districts. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 18(1), 79-95.

Sher, J. P., & Rosenfeld, S. A. (1977). Public education in sparsely populated areas of the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

Silky, W. (2003, January). Personal communication.

Stephens, E. R., & Turner, W. G. (1988). Leadership for rural schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Tagg, G. J. (1982). The trials and tribulations of a rural superintendent. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Association of School Administrators, New Orleans.

Tift, C. (1990). Rural administrative leadership handbook. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.

Wallin, D. C. (1999). Succession management: A necessary strategy for rural school administrators. Opinion paper delivered at University of Saskatchewan.

Wilson, A. P., & Heim, J. M. (1985). Administrative turnover in Kansas rural school districts: 1978-1984. Research in Rural Education, 3(1), 19-22.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu