Achievement Differences between Large and Small Schools in Texas

Lee Stewart

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine whether there exists a relationship between student achievement in Texas, as measured by the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) test, and the size of the high school at different
socioeconomic levels. This study compared five size categories of Texas high schools to determine which size high school had the highest percentage of eleventh grade students passing all four sections (reading, writing, math, and science) of the TAKS test. Data were examined for statistical significance using an ANOVA and a post hoc Scheffé test. The findings indicate that smaller rural schools experience higher percentages of students passing all four parts of the eleventh grade TAKS test in Texas than the larger urban and suburban schools where 25 % or more of the students are living in low socioeconomic situations.

References


Adams, J. (Ed.) (2003). Fighting for the farm: Rural America transformed. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Baas, A. (1994). Promising Strategies for At-Risk Youth. ERIC Digest No. 59. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED328958)

Baldwin, J. (2001). Carnegie Challenge 2001: Creating a New Vision of the Urban High School. New York: Carnegie Corporation.

Bard, J., Gardener, C., Wieland, R. (2005). Rural school consolidation report: history, research summary, conclusions and recommendations. Norman, OK: National Rural Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED497049).

Bickel, R., Howley, C., Williams, T., & Glascock, C. (2000, November). Will the real "Texas miracle in education” please stand up? (ERIC Document Reproduction service No.ED447995)

Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of smallscale schooling. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED401088)

Cushman, K. (1999, November). How small schools increase student learning (and what large schools can do about it). Principal, 79(2), 20-22.

Gewertz, C. (2001). The breakup: Suburbs try smaller high schools. Education Week, 20(33), 18-19.

Gregory, T. (2000). School reform and the no-man's-land of high school size. Articles and Papers. Seattle, WA: Small Schools Project - CPRE, University of Washington. Retrieved September 6, 2007 from http://www.smallschoolsproject.org/PDFS/gregory.pdf

Herzog, J. R., & Pittman, R. B. (1995, October). Home, family, and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(2), 113-119.

Hopkins, T. M. (2005). If you are poor, it is better to be rural: A study of mathematics achievement in Tennessee. The Rural Educator, 27(1), 21-28.

Howley, C. (1994). The academic effectiveness of smallscale schooling. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372897)

Howley, C., & Bickel, R. (1999). The Matthew project: national report (RC 022 082). Randolph, VT.: Rural Challenge Policy Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED433174)

Howley, C., Strange, M., & Bickel, R. (2000). ERIC Digest: Research about school size and school performance in impoverished communities. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448968)

Irmsher, K. (1997). ERIC Digest: School Size. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED414615)

Kennedy, M. (2003). Comfort zone. American School & University, 75(8), 20-25.

Marshall, R., Sampson, P., & Stewart, L. (2008). [Why are Small Schools Successful with Student Achievement?]. Unpublished raw data.

McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (1997). Research in Education: A conceptual Introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Meier, D. W. (1996, September). The big benefits of smallness. Educational Leadership, 54(1), 12-15.

Nathan, J., & Febey, K. (2001). Smaller, safer, saner, successful schools. Minneapolis, MN: Center for School Change, Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota. Retrieved September 27, 2007 from http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/schoolchange/docs/facility.pdf

National Association of Secondary School Principals [NASSP]. (2004). Breaking Ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform. Reston, VA: Author.

The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author.

Ornstein, A. C., & Levine, D. U., (Eds.). (2000). Foundations of Education (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Olson, L. (2000, April 5). Worries of a standards backlash grow. Education Week, 19(30), 12-13.

Patterson, C, (2006). School District Consolidation and Public School Efficiency What Does the Research Say? Texas Public Policy Foundation. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://www.texaspolicy.com/pdf/2006-02-PP-consolidation-cp.pdf

Provasnik, S., KewalRamani, A., Coleman, M., Gilbertson, L., Herring, W., & Xie, Q. (2007). Status of education in rural America. (NCES 2007040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved January 14, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/ruraled/measuring.asp

Raywid, M. A. (1996). ERIC Digest No.112: Downsizing schools in big cities. New York, NY:Eric Clearinghouse on Urban Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393958).

Raywid, M. A. (1997). Small schools: A reform that works. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 34-40.

Raywid, M. A. (1999). Current literature on small schools. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425049).

Roellke, C. (1996). Curriculum adequacy and quality in high schools enrollingfewer than 400 pupils (9-12). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401090).

Sampson, P., & Marshall, R. (2007). When it comes to student achievement: What school boards and superintendents do right in rural and small schools. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995, November). Small schools, great expectations. Educational Leadership, 53(3), 48-53.

Stiefel, L., Iatarola, P., Fruchter, N., & Berne, R. (1998). The effects of size of student body on school costs and performance in New York city high schools. New York, NY. Inst. for Education and Social Policy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420464).

Texas Education Agency (2001). AEIS glossary page. Retrieved September 5, 2007 from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2006/glossary.hhtm

Texas Education Agency (2007). Academic Excellence Indicator System. Retrieved September 20, 2007 from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2006/state.html

University Interscholastic League (UIL). (2007). 2007-2008 Constitution and contest rules. In UIL Establishing Conferences and Districts. Subchapter I. Conferences and Districts. Austin, TX: UIL. Retrieved September 27, 2007 from http://www.uil.utexas.edu/policy/constitution/07_08subI.pdf

Viadero, D. (2001, November 28). Research: Smaller is better. Education Week on the Web, 21(13). Retrieved September 10, 2007 from http://edweek.org/ew/newstory.cfm?slug=13small.h21

Worzbyt, J. C., & Zook, T. (1992). Counselors who make a difference: small schools and rural settings. School Counselor, 39(5), 344-351.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu