Toward a Transdisciplinary Rural Education Research Agenda

Christopher J. Stapel, Alan J. DeYoung

Abstract


This paper examines the representation of rural education research orientations—defined in terms of methodological approach, academic focus and place-consciousness—within the literature and across academic disciplines. A content analysis of 155 abstracts from articles published in the Journal of Research in Rural Education and Rural Sociology between 1997 and 2008 reveals that most rural education research is not quantitative, not academically-oriented and not place-conscious. Furthermore, the abstracts show that Rural Educators are underrepresented in academically-oriented research while Rural Social Scientists are overrepresented in that dimension. The implications of these findings for collaboration are discussed and a policy-relevant, innovative, transdisciplinary research agenda is outlined.

References


Arnold, M. L. (2005). Jump the shark: A rejoinder to Howley, Theobald, and Howley. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(20), 1-2.

Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6), 1-25.

Beaulieu, L. J. (2005). Breaking walls, building bridges: Expanding the presence and relevance of rural sociology. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 1-27.

Burawoy, M. (2004). To advance, sociology must not retreat. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(49), B24.

Cicchinelli, L. F., & Dean, C. B. (2005). It’s all about quality of advice, guidance, and research for rural educators: A rejoinder to Howley, Theobald, and Howley. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(19), 1-2.

Coladarci, T. (2007). Improving the yield of rural education research: An editor’s swan song. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(3), 1-9.

DeYoung, A. J. (1987). The status of American rural education research: An integrated review and commentary. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 123-148.

Farmer, G. (1838). Agriculture. Journal of Education, 1(1), 3.

Holt, J. B. (1936). Current bulletins. Rural Sociology, 1(1), 94-102.

Howley, C. B., Theobald, P., & Howley, A. (2005). What rural education research is of most worth? A reply to Arnold, Newman, Gaddy, and Dean. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(18), 1-6.

Kannapel, P. J., & DeYoung, A. J. (1999). The rural school problem in 1999: A review and critique of the literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(2), 67-79.

Khattri, N., Riley, K. W., & Kane, M. B. (1997). Students at risk in poor, rural areas: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13(2), 79-100.

Krannich, R. S. (2008). Rural sociology at the crossroads. Rural Sociology, 73(1), 1-21.

Theobald, P. (1991). Historical scholarship in nineteenth century rural education. In A. J. DeYoung (Ed.), Rural education: Issues and practice (pp. 3-25). NewYork: Garland.

Sanders, I. (1958). Theories of community development. Rural Sociology, 23(1), 1-12.

Sherwood, T. (2000). Where has all the ‘rural’ gone? Rural education research and current federal reform. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(3), 159-167.

Strange, M. (2009, September). Race to where? Rural Policy Matters. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/articles.php?id=2298

United States Department of Agriculture [USDA]. (2009). Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program. Retrieved August 15, 2009 from http://www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/ruraldevelopmentnri.cfm.

United States Department of Education [USDOE]. (2001). No child left behind: A desktop reference. Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov

United States Department of Education [USDOE]. (2009). Race to the Top Fund. Retrieved March 1, 2010 from http://www.ed.gov


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu