Recommendations from the North Star State: Rural Administrators Speak Out

Julia M. Williams, Gerry Nierengarten

Abstract


Administrators in America’s rural school districts are uniquely challenged to meet increased achievement expectations despite decreasing resources. Mandated reform initiatives, population decline, and the complex formulas used to distribute tax-based funding have disproportionately affected rural schools. In this mixed-methods study, researchers first surveyed K-12 administrators and then conducted focus groups across six regions in Minnesota to determine the nature of the challenges specific to rural administrators and to document their perceived needs for interventions, training, and policy changes. The study identified two categories of common concern: student achievement and fiscal management. Within the category of student achievement, administrators identified four areas of need for assistance: testing and adequate yearly progress, achievement for all, staff and professional development, and data analysis. Within the category of fiscal management, needs for assistance included balancing budgets and transportation/sparsity policy. Analysis of the data gathered indicates statewide implications for professional development and policy review.

References


Bagin, D., Gallagher, D. R., & Moore, E. H. (2007). The school and community relations (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50.

Bryant, J. A. Jr. (2007). Killing Mayberry: The crisis in rural American education. The Rural Educator, 29(1), 7-11.

Cullen, T. A., Brush, T. A., Frey, T. J., Hinshaw, R. S., & Warren, S. J. (2006). NCLB and technology and a rural school: A case study. The Rural Educator, 28(1), 10-17.

Farmer, T. A. (2009). Unique rural district politics. The Rural Educator, 30(2), 29-33.

Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and non-sustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41. doi: 10.1177/0013161X05277975

Harmon, H. (2001, May). Education issues in rural schools in America. Paper presented at Appalachian Rural Systemic Initiatives Conference, Lexington, Kentucky. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED455987)

Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2007). Why rural matters in 2007: The realities of rural education growth. Rural Trust Policy Brief Series on Rural Education. Arlington, VA: The Rural School and Community Trust.

Killeen, K., & Sipple, J. (2000). School consolidation and transportation policy: An empirical and institutional analysis (working paper). Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.

Lamkin, M. L. (2006). Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. The Rural Educator, 28(1), 17-25.

Lowe, J. M. (2006). Rural education: Attracting and retaining teachers in small schools. The Rural Educator, 27(2), 28-31.

McMurray, M. & Ronnigan, B. (2006). Rural education in Minnesota. Rural Minnesota Journal, 1(2), 1-19.

Minnesota House Research Department. (2008). Minnesota School Board Association. State of Minnesota: St. Paul, MN. Retrieved July 5, 2011 from http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/schoolfinanceover_files/frame.htm

Mykerezi, E., Temple, J., & West, K. L. (2009). Cost-effective policies to improve rural K-12 education in Minnesota. A region apart: A look at challenges and strategies for rural K-12 schools. St Peter, MN: Center for Rural Policy and Development.

Reeves, C. (2003). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Education Laboratory. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED475037)

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research; Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

Thorson, G. & Edmondson, J. (2000). Making difficult times worse: The impact of per pupil funding formulas on rural Minnesota schools. Center for Rural Policy and Development. Mankato, MN: Minnesota State University.

Thorson, G., & Maxwell, N. (2002). Small schools under siege: Evidence of resource inequality in Minnesota public schools. Center for Rural Policy and Development. Mankato, MN: Minnesota State University.

United States General Accounting Office. (2003). Title 1: Characteristics of tests will influence expenses; information sharing will help states realize efficiencies. Washington, DC; United States Congress. Retrieved July 5, 2011 from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03389.pdf

Warne, L. (2010). Toward a logical, equitable and successful learning experience for all. Rural Minnesota Journal, 5, 1-8.

Williams, J., Nierengarten, G., Riordan, K., Munson, B., & Corbett, D. (2009). Learning communities in transition: The voices of rural administrators. A region apart: A look at challenges and strategies for rural K-12 schools. St Peter, MN: Center for Rural Policy and Development.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu