How Do We Get Them on the Farm? Efforts to Improve Rural Teacher Recruitment and Retention in Arkansas

Robert Maranto, James V. Shuls


Rural schools, particularly high poverty rural schools, often have difficulty hiring and retaining qualified teachers. Here, we discuss three programs the Arkansas Department of Education has used to attract teachers to teacher Geographic Shortage Districts (GSDs) through material incentives. Unfortunately, none of the programs have had much success, perhaps in part since the funding offered was inadequate to attract new teachers to isolated communities. Additionally, we analyze the use of materialistic and non-materialistic incentives on the websites of all school districts designated as GSDs by the Arkansas Department of Education. Few GSDs display non-materialistic appeals that might entice individuals to seek out employment in the district, with the notable exception of KIPP Delta, the only charter school on the list, which has much more success recruiting teachers. We end with suggestions for policymakers and school district officials seeking to attract teachers to geographic shortage areas.


Anderson, R., & Chang, B. (2011). Mathematics course-taking in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(1).

Arkansas Department of Education. (2008). Arkansas’ Equity Plan: Updated October 2008. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from

Arkansas Department of Higher Education. (2010). State teacher education program: Shortage area list. Retrieved from

Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1997) Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 17699. Retrieved from

Clotfelter, C., Glennie, E., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2006). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Retrieved from

Eppley, K. (2009). Rural schools and the highly qualified teacher provision of No Child Left Behind: A critical policy analysis. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(4).

Grissom, J. A. (2008). But do they stay? Addressing issues of teacher retention through alternative certification. In P. Grossman & S. Loeb (Eds.), Alternative routes to teaching (pp. 129-158). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Hanushek, E., & Lindseth, A. (2009). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses: Solving the funding-achievement puzzle in America's public schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hanushek, E., Kain, J. F., O’Brien, D., Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 7082. Retrieved from

Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354.

Hess, F. M. (2010). Education unbound. Arlington: ASCD.

Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 86(631), 16-31.

Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy: University of Washington. Retrieved from

Liu, E., Johnson, S., & Peske, H. G. (2004). New teachers and the Massachusetts signing bonus: The limits of inducements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 217-236.

Maranto, R., & Maranto, A. (2006). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans: The role of organization culture. In F. Hess (Ed.) Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, Challenges, Possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Maranto, R. & McShane, M. Q. (2012). President Obama and education reform: The personal and the political. New York: Macmillan/Palgrave.

Maranto, R., & Shuls, J. V. (2011). Lessons from KIPP Delta. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 52-56.

McClure, C. & Reeves, C. (2004). Rural teacher recruitment and retention: Review of the research and practice literature. Nashville, TN. Appalachia Educational Laboratory.

Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 418–58.

Ritter, G. W. (2009). Education reform in Arkansas: Hitting a moving target. In J.A. Parry, & R.P. Wang, (Eds.), Readings in Arkansas politics and government (pp. 385-404). Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press.

Ritter, G. W., Maranto, R., & Buck, S. (2009). Harnessing private incentives in public education. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(3), 249-269.

Shuls, J. V., & Maranto, R. (forthcoming). Show them the mission: A comparison of teacher recruitment incentives in high need communities. Social Science Quarterly.

Steele, J. L., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2009). Do financial incentives help low-performing schools attract and keep academically talented teachers? Evidence from California. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 14780. Retrieved from

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publication of the National Rural Education Association -

Report problems or questions about to the website to