A Comparison of Professional Development Practices in Rural and Urban High School

Teresa Wallace


Because standards-based reform emphasizes improved teaching as the best path to increased learning and improved student performance, one would expect high performing schools to be implementing effective professional development practices. This study examines professional development practices in high performing urban and persistently low achieving rural high schools in Kentucky. Findings from the non-experimental descriptive study suggest similarities in professional development practices between the two groups. Differences existed in how well leadership addresses teacher professional development needs and in sufficient training to utilize instructional technology. Characteristics of effective professional development are not being fully implemented in either group of schools.


Athans, S. & Devine, D. (2013). Motivating every student in literacy: Including the highly unmotivated. New York, NY: Routledge

Desimone, L. (2011). Research & Development: A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68-71.

Fields,E., Levy, A., Tzur, K. Martinez-Gudapakkam, A., & Jablonski, E. (2012). The science of professional development: If you offer it, will they come? If they come, will it matter? Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 44-46.

Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658.

Guskey, T. & Yoon, K. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-499.

National Institute for School Leadership Instructor’s Guide, Course Two. (2013). Washington, DC: A Subsidiary of the National Center on Education and the Economy.

Priority Schools by Cohort. (2013). Retrieved Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406 December 1, 2013, from http://education.ky.gov/school/Documents/Priority%20Schools%20by%20Cohort%20map-071113.pdf.

RLISP Eligibility Spreadsheet for Fiscal Year 2013/School Year 2013/2014, Kentucky. (2013). Retrieved November 29, 2013, from www2.ed.gov/programs/reaprlisp/eligible13/index.html.

Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.

The Status of Rural Education. (2013). Retrieved December 1, 2013, from nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_tla.asp.

Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers , REL 2007-No. 033. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences.

Yoon, K.S., Garet, M., Birman, B., & Jacobson, R. (2007). Examining the effects of mathematics and science professional development on teachers’ instructional practice: Using professional development activity logs. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publication of the National Rural Education Association - http://www.nrea.net

Report problems or questions about to the website to jshedd@library.msstate.edu